In case you're in denial about the Treason Media - and I didn't slap that moniker on these f*ckers because I was trying to be cute - being wholly committed to covering up Barack Obama's shady and questionable past in order to run out the clock and install this Marxist and his fascist fellow traveler Dems into total control of the government, take a gander at this note cross-posted several places:
A READER AT A MAJOR NEWSROOM EMAILS: “Off the record, every suspicion you have about MSM being in the tank for O is true. We have a team of 4 people going thru dumpsters in Alaska and 4 in arizona. Not a single one looking into Acorn, Ayers or Freddiemae. Editor refuses to publish anything that would jeopardize election for O, and betting you dollars to donuts same is true at NYT, others. People cheer when CNN or NBC run another Palin-mocking but raising any reasonable inquiry into obama is derided or flat out ignored. The fix is in, and its working.”The Anchoress adds (emphasis and links in original):
I have a couple friends who work in the MSM, too, and one of them tells me the newsroom is (exact words) “unbelievably cavalier” about any complaints viewers register about their reports, what they ignore, their bias or the way they edit Republicans vs. the way the treat Dems. “Cavalier” as in the fix is in and they don’t even have to pretend to care what half the country thinks or wants.
I suppose this is why print media and the press in general don’t care about their tumbling revenues; when The Pelosi gets the regulated internet and restricted Congress that she wants, and Obama gets his thugs and his Justice Department monitoring, intimidating and shutting down alternative media (and the dissenting voices we’ve been told are “patriotic” when a Republican is in the White House) the incestuous mainstream press will go back to being the only game in town. Pravda West.
(Shrug) everyone sees it coming; the voters don’t seem to want to stop it.
I’m praying. It’s all I can do.
We shouldn't have to go to Fox News to get the conservative side of a story that the entire ABC/NBC/CBS/CNN/MSNBC/NY Times/WaPo leviathan buries because it's not in line with their agendas. There shouldn't be a need for separate channels for one point of view or the other. It used to be that we'd get the five Ws from the press, but we just get them trying to get Dubya, the consequences be damned.
I almost fell off the couch to see "Saturday Night Live" actually mention Obama's felon pal Tony Rezko in their debate sketch last weekend.
What does it say when a comedy show will mention Obama's criminal pals but that same network's TWO news operations pretend it doesn't exist? The laughter was muted at the reference, probably because they didn't know what it was a reference to. It's not as if there's been much coverage of the Obama/Rekzo connection. Just like the Obama/Ayers or Obama/Wright teamups. Imagine that.
You stay classy, Treason Media